Affiliate Marketing Secrets

I love to travel and a lady recently told me she got free flight tickets just by racking up flyer points.
How does this work and what is the best way to do this? and best company to get affiliated with?
Thanks!

everybody already knows that their was just an image because of the marketing, created by their manager but I have some doubts and questions about it : can you be pretending for ten years to be someone that you aren’t in reality? they shared kisses and hughs for ten years! even if they changed their image then there were still used to hold hands in nterviews! so, beside the contradictory things they were used to say in interviews ( they were used to regard their sexuality or said that they loved each other or maybe that they wanted to help disguised homo people to being not ashamed of their feelings etc.. ) do you think that their kisses hughs touching physical contacts may have lead them to a possible attraction to each other expecially in the beginning they started singing that they were 14? . Lena said in a documetary that there’s was some truth in it she meant that she felt the kinda sensation when you start to wonder if a friend is more than a friend and this sort of confusion was evident in their performances,and that this happened at the beginning. Yulia said that she never liked a girl before becoming part of tatu project but this experience made her pay attention to girls too and stated that she attended a girl then once. Why do you think their manager had chosen them? maybe because yulia is good enough to act like a boy, she looked more intrested in touching lena in the performances than how much lena was! and lena such like an innocent child? well, even if this was just marketing I think that may have helped “disguised people” but what really happened to them in their deep inside? and were they friends? I guess they should be probabily they spent 10 years together but they were never been caught by paparazzi doing shopping together for example! just don’t know wanna know your opinion, I like their songs alot they even made me learn russian! but I’m a little disappointed if they may have been fake for so long even if I’m not a lesbian they were my favourite singers and I also have heard about a possible comning back! then I know that at 14 everybody can have this sort of confusion but in this case I don’t think that a such intimate thing can be easily revelead on tv as lena did, so was she pretending?
I’ve heard those things in “t.a.t.u documentary” and !the anatomy of t.a.tu” where lena also added that she felt guilty for pretending to be a lesbian and confessed to a personal priest.

What is this Software for ?
– Get do follow high PR backlinks
– Target Niche Specific Traffic
– Gain higher search engine rankings
– Send traffic to Youtube Videos
– Brand awareness
– Affiliate marketing success
– Indexing
– Scalable
– and much more
I get here, is this good? http://www.warriorplus.com/w/a/5k5t0

Or should they be shamed? And if they’re not directly hurting anyone, are they allowed the luxury of having the best of both worlds?
A gender-related example is the way that many men and women will choose their partner for superficial reasons (looks or money), but react negatively to being called superficial. They want to reap the benefits of superficiality without the tarnished reputation that goes with it.
A non-gender related example would be wearing and using animal products which are made through non-ethical means. It’s immoral to support killing animals for aesthetic purposes (or at least it’s MORE immoral than refusing to support this industry), but do we deserve the guilt that goes with this? Or should we be allowed to enjoy certain unethical luxuries without being made to feel ashamed?
By teaching people that they’re allowed the best of both worlds, aren’t we teaching them a bad lesson? We are all guilty of something or another. Technically, we deserve to feel ashamed for various reasons. Through guilt, we may learn from our mistakes and feel obliged to refrain from these guilty activities/attitudes, making the world a better place. But if the world will not be a better place, is the guilt then unnecessary? Are we automatically exempt from the lesson if it doesn’t affect those around us? Going back to the first example, which doesn’t usually hurt people, would you say that a person is right to refuse the title of superficiality since their “crime” is harmless?
– – –
Now I will share with you a short anecdote about a unicorn and a s℮x toy manufacturer.
Once upon a time, there was an old woman named Dorothy who made a living making dıIdos. Her toys were not like any other – one special secret that no other manufacturers knew about allowed her to monopolise this industry over the years. Now, at age 84, she had a huge factory and employed over 7,000 workers, all sworn to secrecy about the one, special secret that made her dıIdos so rarely exquisite and brilliantly effective. The secret, alas, was unicorn blood. For inside her thriving workshop lived a herd of beautiful unicorns, each subject to questionable practices by her trained employees to draw their blood for the hedonistic pleasure of young single women (including feminists) everywhere. This questionable practice caused the unicorn a great deal of distress on a daily basis, and physical pain as the blood was drawn through their sensitive flank.
The workers were merciless, thriving on money, materialism and the incentive of keeping their highly ranked business up at its optimal position in the world market, in the form of monthly bonuses. The unicorns lived a sad and lonely life, fearing humankind for their cold-hearted treatment.
One day, the woman felt a strange sensation across her body, a feeling of lethargy and distance – the feeling of her life slipping away. She knew that soon she would die. At 84, she had lived a full life, with all the money and possessions she could ever desire, with only the shameful secret she kept hidden at the bottom of her heart to bring moments of darkness into her life. Throughout her existence, it had been a constant battle of her conscience. Should she admit her terrible secret, and shatter her financial bliss by screaming out her cruelty for the world to hear, only to be shattered to pieces by the immediate onslaught of legal battles, bloody hatred pouring from the mouths of animal rights activists, and the absolute end of her precious business she had invested so much time and energy into, as the secrecy of her success became common knowledge to the world.
Now, at the end of her life, she felt strangely immune to this idea of destruction. Was it perhaps because, in death, she could no longer appreciate her physical luxuries and the warm sentiment of success? Strangely, this wasn’t why, she mused. She considered that her success could be considered unearned by her unwillingness to admit her wrongs, instead of simply celebrating her brilliance. Suddenly, she wanted the world to know exactly just what kind of cold-hearted b*tch she was. She wanted paint sprayed on her coffin in the shape of offensive scribbles; she wanted to be pushed off the edge of life by the massive expression of guilt of an entire nation.
Slowly, Dorothy made her way to the unicorn enclosure. It was after working hours, and most of the creatures were sleeping. She looked around and watched the movement of a wakened creature as it tensed, noticing her presence. She sighed, watching the animal in the corner of her eye as thoughts of her impending doom flooded her mind. Slowly she closed her eyes and, with a sharp jolt, her heart flooded with adrenaline as the unicorn unexpectedly kicked her in the head. She fell to the ground, taken by surprise, and died instantly. A dildo fell from an overhanging shelf and landed in her eye socket.
The end.
What is the moral of

i completed my b.tech(it) in anna univ affiliated college,…….

What do you think of this academic paper by a team of academics at Haute Ecole de Gestion de Genève, 7, rte de Drize, 1227 Carouge in Switzerland?:- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221709004251
Do you agree with the main results of the study which claim that the stability of marital relations would be improved by 21% if both partners are the same age, cultural background, educational attainment, and both have no previous experience of divorce?:-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1222726/The-secret-happy-marriage—man-5-years-older-hasn-t-hitched-before.html
http://www.bodyspacesociety.eu/2009/11/02/love-the-swiss-way-sociologists-want-to-optimize-the-marriage-market/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-10463132-71.html
Would it be correct to suggest that the study is flawed because the social, cultural, and political climate in Switzerland is unique and different to other Western countries?
Also, is there any chance whatsoever that the study is biased because Switzerland has a relatively recent history of immigration compared to other Western countries such as the UK and US; which implies that most of the ethnic minorities who are married to Swiss nationals in this sample are actually from non-Western countries, and this usually entails a higher risk of cultural difference between the partners; such cultural difference will tend to increase the risk of divorce or separation.
This is in stark contrast to the situation in Britain and the US, whereby, there are more ethnic minorities who are born, educated, and socialized in the respective country, which reduces the cultural difference factor quite significantly; and this in turn will reduce the risk of divorce or separation in the case of interracial relations between ethnic minorities and White people.
The study is flawed in another sense, because there is the underlying assumption that people of a different cultural/national origin will always have a different culture to the White majority, which is only true as an average, but this should not be generalized to include everyone who is an ethnic minority. The study is flawed because it doesn’t take into consideration the length of time an individual is exposed to the culture of the White majority; there is considerable difference between a recent immigrant from Africa and a black immigrant who has lived in a Western country from an early age. The latter is more acculturated and better adapted to his environment, but the first example is that of an African immigrant who is fresh off the boat.
There is a considerable difference between immigrants who are American to all intents and purposes and the more recent immigrants who are obviously fresh off the boat and foreigners; but this study is a simplified model of different social groups, which assumes that all people belonging to the same social group are exactly the same.
Hence, the study is biased, subjective, and flawed because the authors obviously have a hidden agenda and what is applicable to the social, cultural, and political climate in Switzerland should not be assumed to apply anywhere else in the world.
Also, it’s useful to remember that the 21% increase in the rate of divorce or separation is an estimate based on aggregate but distinct criteria: age, education, cultural background, and previous history of divorce; but on no account are we to assume that differences in cultural origin would account for the entire 21% estimate. On the contrary, differences in cultural origin should account for a mere fraction of that 21% result according to the study.
The study is to some extent an attack on interracial/inter-ethnic marriage where the partners have a different cultural origin; but at the same time, it’s important to remember that differences in cultural origin cannot account for the entire 21% result in the study.
The American Clinical Psychologist Maria P.P. Root has written a book about interracial marriage in the US, and she is known to have said that cultural differences are more likely to be the cause of divorce or separation than any difference in age, education, class, and RACE.
TRUE OR FALSE?