Categorized | Affiliate Marketing 101

Why Are Conservatives More Angry At Ows Protesters Than At Wall Street Which Got $7.77 Trillion From The Fed?

The Federal Reserve and the big banks fought for more than two years to keep details of the largest bailout in U.S. history a secret. Now, the rest of the world can see what it was missing.
The Fed didn’t tell anyone which banks were in trouble so deep they required a combined $1.2 trillion on Dec. 5, 2008, their single neediest day. Bankers didn’t mention that they took tens of billions of dollars in emergency loans at the same time they were assuring investors their firms were healthy. And no one calculated until now that banks reaped an estimated $13 billion of income by taking advantage of the Fed’s below-market rates, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its January issue.
Saved by the bailout, bankers lobbied against government regulations, a job made easier by the Fed, which never disclosed the details of the rescue to lawmakers even as Congress doled out more money and debated new rules aimed at preventing the next collapse.
A fresh narrative of the financial crisis of 2007 to 2009 emerges from 29,000 pages of Fed documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and central bank records of more than 21,000 transactions. While Fed officials say that almost all of the loans were repaid and there have been no losses, details suggest taxpayers paid a price beyond dollars as the secret funding helped preserve a broken status quo and enabled the biggest banks to grow even bigger…
The size of the bailout came to light after Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News, won a court case against the Fed and a group of the biggest U.S. banks called Clearing House Association LLC to force lending details into the open.
The Fed, headed by Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, argued that revealing borrower details would create a stigma — investors and counterparties would shun firms that used the central bank as lender of last resort — and that needy institutions would be reluctant to borrow in the next crisis. Clearing House Association fought Bloomberg’s lawsuit up to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear the banks’ appeal in March 2011.
$7.77 Trillion
The amount of money the central bank parceled out was surprising even to Gary H. Stern, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis from 1985 to 2009, who says he “wasn’t aware of the magnitude.” It dwarfed the Treasury Department’s better-known $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. Add up guarantees and lending limits, and the Fed had committed $7.77 trillion as of March 2009 to rescuing the financial system, more than half the value of everything produced in the U.S. that year.http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-28…

No Responses to “Why Are Conservatives More Angry At Ows Protesters Than At Wall Street Which Got $7.77 Trillion From The Fed?”

  1. RS says:

    Rich becomes richer and poor becomes poorer. That’s the trend in the US.

  2. One Term Blunder says:

    Do you think your Messiah will give Freddie the $7.8 billion bailout they’re requesting?
    I guess a $12 million dollar CEO bonus wasn’t enough for Freddie & Fannie, right?

  3. Fellow Dendron says:

    FOX and Rush told them to hate the OWS. They suck up that propaganda and there is no shaking them free of it.Teatards are teatards.

  4. Dog Paws says:

    conservatives are angry because the OWS makes them look bad.

  5. Summerti says:

    Because they are raining on their parade.

  6. Wounded Duck says:

    OWS does not contribute to the GOP.
    Politics has become ALL ABOUT THE MONEY!!!

  7. acid victim 25 says:

    Perhaps someone ought to be angry with “the Fed”

  8. Obama's my zero says:

    Wall Street hell. Why aren’t they protesting Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac?

  9. Tringle says:

    Because occupy gives the fed a pass and says capitalism is the problem and capitalism must end.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l97SuV6DT…
    No wonder Ben Bernanke supports the occupy movement.
    Occupy protested Ron Paul and Paul is the only candidate that wants to end corporatism.

  10. Jeff D says:

    I’m not a big fan of bailouts, but those were loans and they were repaid, with interest.
    Also, if they were loaned $7.77 trillion and only made $13 billion that’s pretty pathetic–that’s less than a 0.2% rate of return. Even my bank pays a higher interest rate than that! 😀

  11. Bryan says:

    Im not angry at ows. In fact I understand their frustration. I just wish they understood economics and what life liberty and the pursuit of happiness was and blamed the right people….enormous government.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

Powered by Yahoo! Answers