Tag Archive | "ruling"

Will Obamacare Ruling Mean Less Abortions?


The Obama administration announced the final rules under the Affordable Care Act on Friday requiring most employer health insurance plans to cover employees’ contraception without a copay.
“The health care law guarantees millions of women access to recommended preventive services at no cost,” said Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in a statement. “Today’s announcement reinforces our commitment to respect the concerns of houses of worship and other non-profit religious organizations that object to contraceptive coverage, while helping to ensure that women get the care they need, regardless of where they work.”
The rule, which goes into effect August 1 for religious non-profits after a year-long grace period, completely exempts houses of worship and makes accommodations for many religiously affiliated schools, hospitals and charities. Under the accommodation, religious non-profits can avoid having to pay for contraception directly by having the third-party insurance provider foot the bill for that specific coverage.

Posted in Featured ArticlesComments (0)

Why Did The Wto People Choose To Ignore The Health Of Innocent Chinese Civilians?


.
Raw mineral is not like crops that can be harvested annually but used up eventually. China should protect her limited amount of raw minerals before it is too late.
Furthermore, in the old days, Chinese people didnt have a correct concept about enviromental protection thus kept mining in a damaging way to the environment and human health. Now, Chinese people have come to realize how wrong they were for keep damaging the environment and the health of Chinese people through the way they mined.
Now, the WTO is helping its affiliates to continue to exploit China’s limited amount of raw minerals and the WTO deliberately ignores the Chinese people’s health and China’s environment, by filing a ruling against China.
The filing shows clearly that the WTO is not an orgainization deserves any respects from China and 1.5 billions of Chinese people world wide. China does not need to respect the ruling of WTO which actually has motives to hurt the health and best interest of innocent Chinese civilians like what the westerners and japanese did 100 years ago..
Can WTO people answer my question if it is their ulterior motive to killing the innocent Chinese civilians ?
.
.

Posted in Featured ArticlesComments (0)


Archives

Powered by Yahoo! Answers