Tag Archive | "rebels"

What Are Your Thoughts On The Syrian Rebels Massacre Of An Entire Christian Village?


http://www.aina.org/news/20130529024056.…
YOU DECIDE
According to the Assyrian International News Agency (AINA) forces of the Free Syrian Army massacred the village on May 27: “The armed rebels affiliated to the Free Syrian Army (FSA) raided the Christian-populated al-Duvair village in Reef (outskirts of) Homs near the border with Lebanon today and massacred all its civilian residents, including women and children. The Syrian army, however, intervened and killed tens of terrorists during heavy clashes which are still going on in al-Duvair village.”
The Terrible Future Of The Syrian War & it’s probable outcome.http://www.alt-market.com/articles/1535-…
Using Vietnam and other proxy wars as a reference, here is how the war in Syria is likely to progress over the coming months:
1) Heavy weapons will be supplied to the insurgency, including anti-aircraft weapons, leading to increased casualties, especially civilian casualties.
2) Assad will respond with expanded and deadly airstrikes and ground troops will advance with the aid of Hezbollah.
3) Iran will begin openly supplying arms, and step up covert supplies of advisors and ground troops.
4) Russia will increase arms shipments even further, including anti-ship, anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles in order to dissuade U.S. and Israeli interests from sending their own forces into the area.
5) Syrian insurgents will begin losing ground quickly. The UN will offer to “mediate” a ceasefire, but this will only be designed to allow the insurgents time to regroup, and for the U.S., EU and Israel to position themselves for attack.
6) The UN ceasefire talks will be a wash, if they even take place. Israel will begin regular airstrikes in the name of stopping Iran and Hezbollah from interfering in the war, or to stop them from obtaining “chemical weapons.” The strikes will be aimed at Syrian military facilities and Syrian infrastructure. There will be many civilian casualties.
7) Syria will respond with ground to air and ground to ground missiles. Israeli cities will see far more precise targeting than the scud missiles used by Iraq during Gulf I and Gulf II. Civilian deaths will be much higher than expected, despite common claims that Israeli missile defenses are the most advanced in the world (Israel has never faced the threat of advanced Russian missile systems).
8) A no-fly zone will be announced over Syria, enforced by U.S. and Israeli planes, along with anti-aircraft batteries.
9) A violent attack will take place in Israel, likely against a civilian population center (I would not be surprised if chemical weapons are involved). The attack will be blamed on the Assad government, or affiliated allies. It might be a real attack or it might be a false flag. In either case, the result will be the commitment of Israeli ground troops.
10) I think it highly probable that Israel will be the first Western country to invade Syria. However, their involvement will immediately draw a declaration of war from Iran, and, increased ship movements from Russia, which maintains a strategic naval base off the coast of Tartus.
11) Israel will be swallowed up in a strategic quandary, and will demand U.S. military action. The U.S. will supply that action. Combat will spread into cross-border battles in countries not directly engaged in the fight (as it did in Cambodia during Vietnam).
12) China will respond with economic retaliation, dumping the U.S. dollar as the world reserve currency. Russia will respond by reducing petro-product exports to Europe and staging a massive naval presence in the region. From this point, all bets are off…

Posted in Featured ArticlesComments (0)

How Does Obama Arming Al Qaeda Rebels In Syria Make Any Logical Sense?


Sending ammunition, small arms and ground to air shoulder rockets to the enemy, composed of the Al Qaeda affiliated Al Nusrah and Hezbollah, we have been engaged with for 12 years seems counter productive.
Especially when we consider that he just told us we shouldn’t get pulled into conflicts counter to our interest in the Arabian Peninsula.
Except if you remember recently Obama declared the winding down of the war with Al Qeada.
ThinkProgress reports Obama’s statement:
“Groups like [Al Qaeda in Arabian Peninsula] must be dealt with, but in the years to come, not every collection of thugs that labels themselves Al Qaeda will pose a credible threat to the United States,” Obama said. “Unless we discipline our thinking and our actions, we may be drawn into more wars we don’t need to fight, or continue to grant presidents unbound powers more suited for traditional armed conflicts between nation states.” http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/0…
Is he just uninformed, does he have a very short memory or is he a seditious supporter of radical, conservative Islamic Wahhabi & Muslim Brotherhood terrorists?
What is his motivation to send arms, to oppose Putin?
Can we trust him, does he know what he is talking about, does he have the United State’s best interest at heart? Is he performing his sworn duty to protect the U. S. Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic?
Progressives, Do we need to fight this war?

Posted in Featured ArticlesComments (0)

Should The Us And Europe Be Supporting The Syrian Government Not Condemning It?


It seems that the Syrian rebels are affiliated to the islamic brother hood and supported to some extent by Iran. Considering the US and Nato are fighting against a similar alignment in Afghanistan, why are they not supporting the Syrian government?

Posted in Featured ArticlesComments (0)


Archives

Powered by Yahoo! Answers